Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Freedom of Speech: Clergy Deserve It, Too

In 1954 it was future president Lyndon Baines Johnson, then a senator from Texas, who proposed another amendment that would have the consequence, intended or not, of restricting the free-speech rights of religious leaders. The amendment rendered them unable to speak freely from their pulpits so long as they operated as 501c3 charitable organizatons, which entitled them to receive tax-deductible contributions.

Sen. Johnson inserted into the tax code an amendment that disallowed a (non-profit) 501C3 organization from endorsing or opposing a political candidate.

Although it has been speculated that Johnson was targeting various 501c3 groups that were opposing him, the unintended consequence of Johnson's amendment, not unlike Blaine's, has been to keep people of faith out of the public square and limit their rights by preventing clergy from speaking directly and forthrightly from the pulpit about their views -- including endorsing political candidates -- so long as they operated as a non-profit and received tax-deductible contributions.

The most recent case that has pointed out the absurdity of Johnson's amendment involved All Saints Church in Pasadena, Calif., whose pastor George Regas gave a sermon imagining what Jesus Christ might say were he to find himself in a debate with then-presidential candidates George W. Bush and John F. Kerry.
Although the IRS gave up the battle against All Saints in September, the underlying questions still haven't been addressed: Why can't a preacher endorse a political candidate from the pulpit on a Sunday morning? Why should the First Amendment not apply to words that emanate from a church pulpit? What right do government bureaucrats have to restrict the speech of any religious leader?
Today, the practical result of Johnson's amendment remains that religious leaders somehow forfeit their right to free speech when they climb into a pulpit.

The pastor of the liberal All Saints Church in Pasadena should be able to look out at his congregation and urge them to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2008. Conversely, across the country, the pastor of World Harvest Church, Rod Parsley, an outspoken conservative, should be able to endorse the Republican candidate as well.

Contrary to the now-famous assertion by then-Washington Post reporter Michael Weiskopf that people of faith were "poor, uneducated and easy to command," parishioners are perfectly capable of taking into account, without blindly following, endorsements by their religious leaders.

And with churches able to participate widely in American public life by opening charter schools and preachers able to speak freely from the pulpit, all Americans will be freer as they fully exercise their constitutional rights.

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, November 4, 2007

UPDATE: Christian foster parents no longer forced to promote homosexuality

Christian foster parents no longer forced to promote homosexuality
A committed Christian foster couple who were told they would have to give up their foster son following their refusal to sign an Equality policy, which forbids discrimination on the grounds of homosexuality, have won the right to have their personal convictions and conscientious objections recognised.

Vince Matherick, a 65-year-old minister at South Chard Christian Church in Somerset and his wife, Pauline were previously told they would not be re-registered as foster carers because of their religious beliefs, despite the fact they had been fostering since 2001 and had looked after 28 children.

Earlier this year they were asked to agree to a new Equality policy which would require them to say that homosexual relationships were equal to heterosexual marriages if asked by a child about such relationships.

Mr Matherick explained that he and his wife had never discriminated against anybody, but that they would not teach children about the practice of homosexuality because the Bible condemns any kind of sexual practice outside of a marital relationship.

The couple were threatened with the prospect of having to give up custody of their 11-year-old foster son after being told that would have to sign the Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs), which are part of the Equality Act 2006, by social services.

The couple reported that they had been told by officials they would be required to discuss same-sex relationships with their child who is only 11, and say that gay partnerships were just as acceptable as heterosexual marriages.
Andrea Williams of the Lawyers Christian Fellowship commented, “This is a significant step forward for Christian freedoms in that the Council has agreed not to force Mr and Mrs Matherick to act against their Christian beliefs.

“This should be of enormous encouragement to all Christians who want to take up the important role of caring for vulnerable children.”


Powered by ScribeFire.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, November 1, 2007

"Top 30" List of Exemplary Ministries 2006

MinistryWatch.com Shining Lights "Top 30" List of Exemplary Ministries 2006 Released

Among them:

Family Research Council

Jews for Jesus


Josh McDowell Ministries


Operation Blessing

Ravi Zacharias International Ministries/ RZIM


Voice of the Martyrs/ VOM

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Christianity is the fastest growing religion in the world - NOT Islam

Is Islam the Fastest-Growing Religion? Guess Again - News Bloggers
Many people think Islam is the fastest-growing religion in the world. Not true. Islam is growing fast, but Christianity is growing faster. Indeed there are twice as many Christians as Muslims in the world today and the gap is becoming larger. Moreover, Christianity has become the world's only religion that is truly universal.

Islam too has a wide reach, but Islam has only a small presence in the United States, Canada, Central and South America, and Australia. Christianity, by contrast, is strong everywhere in the world except the Middle East. Islam is growing mainly through reproduction, which is to say by Muslims having large families. Christianity is growing both through reproduction and through conversion.

So if Christianity is growing so fast, why don't we see it? Because the growth is occuring mainly in Asia and Africa. The full story is told in What's So Great About Christianity but here are some examples. In 1900 less than 10 percent of Africa was Christian. Now it's around 50 percent. That's an increase from 10 million Christians in 1900 to more than 350 million today. The story is pretty much the same in Asia. China now has an underground church numbering in the tens of millions. In Korea, Christians outnumber Buddhists and, in a remarkable historical reversal, now send missionaries to Europe to convert the natives. Some Asian and African churches have so many members that pastors have to tell people not to come very Sunday, because there is not enough room in the pews.
....the typical secular couple has one child while the typical religious couple in the West has two children and the typical religious couple outside the West has 3-5 children. Guess who is going to own the twenty-first century!


Powered by ScribeFire.

Sphere: Related Content

The New Morality

CFP: The new morality by Klaus Rohrich , 10/30/07
All cultures require a set of moral principles in order to maintain a sense of self-worth. Our own culture is currently in the process of redefining our understanding of morality to better conform to the dominant social and political ethos. All that was once a moral imperative is now passe and a new sense of morality is appearing on the social and cultural landscape.

Issues such as premarital sex, cheating on exams, attending church, drug use, abortion and a long list of others have gradually eroded from the moral radar and have left a vacuum that is being filled by a new set of moral values.

Interestingly these values, while they assume a moral importance, have little to do with morality in the absolute sense and tend to be more political as well as relative in nature. The terminology that defines this new morality involves words such as “sexism”, “homophobia”, “racism” and my own personal favorite “denial of global warming”.

It’s pretty easy to be a moral person nowadays, given that nothing is really expected except that one talks the talk.
Belief in global warming has now assumed religious proportions with those who question the orthodox explanation for our changing climate being labeled “deniers”. In another age those who defied orthodoxy were deemed “heretics” and tortured or burned at the stake. There appears to be little difference in our current attitudes and the attitudes displayed during the Inquisition, except we no longer burn people at the stake.
We define fundamentalist Christians as “scary”, yet condemn those who express concern about radical Islam as being “Islamophobic”.
Few graduates from our universities possess the tools necessary to make a meaningful contribution to society, as throughout their educational career self esteem trumped achievement. Now we’re turning these unfortunates loose to fend for themselves with a less than adequate skill set. But they all seem to think very highly of themselves.

The morality that we are abandoning is the glue that has held our civilization together for centuries. The morality that we are adopting in its place will only speed up our decline, as it requires almost no meaningful commitment on the part of individuals. On the contrary, being moral is now easier than ever with no effort required.


Powered by ScribeFire.

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, October 29, 2007

Jesus, yes; coercion, no

Townhall.com::The News::News Article
In an "I'm OK, you're OK" world, any mention of a crucified-for-our-sins, raised-from-the-dead Jesus can't be anything but offensive.

And when representatives of the World Council of Churches, the Vatican and major world religions gather to draft a code of ethics targeting evangelism efforts that violate the "religious sensibilities" of others, you're almost guaranteed an outcome hostile to the core message of historic Christianity.
Discussions with other religious traditions are valuable, to the extent they dispel myths and stereotypes and increase understanding between groups that often find themselves at odds with each other. The problem arises when you start trying to forge an agreement about religious truth. Diplomacy breaks down when folks on one side of the table subscribe to a starry-eyed "all roads lead to the same God" viewpoint and those on the other side believe "there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12 NAS).

Evangelical Christians -- including Southern Baptists -- ought to be at the forefront of any campaign to prevent unscrupulous people from pressuring vulnerable souls into changing their religious affiliation. Any Christian who bribes, harasses or forces someone to "convert" to Christianity betrays the Lord who chose to lay down His own life to free the rest of us.

Authentic Christianity is about relationship, not religion. While institutional religion may be worried about its members "converting" to another group, biblical Christianity focuses on the personal transformation that occurs when a person accepts in faith the free gift of eternal life offered by Jesus Christ.

There's more than one fly in the ointment with this inter-religious dialogue about "conversion."

For one thing, evangelicals aren't the primary culprits when it comes to coercing others in matters of religion. Hindu nationalists in India regularly force new Christians to renounce Jesus at gunpoint. It is not uncommon in Pakistan for Muslim men to "convert" Christian women and girls by kidnapping and raping them. Evangelicals are far more likely to run feeding programs and conduct medical clinics.

Another problem with the dialogue is that Jesus was an exclusivist about salvation. He told His followers He was the only way back to God -- and He commanded them to make disciples of all the nations. That doesn't sit well with many people these days, including many of those participating in the discussion about ethical evangelism.
"I don't believe in a slashing evangelism that cuts somebody down, but the truth can be painful," Kammerdiener said. "Christians are not saying that our philosophy is superior. We are, however, saying that it is an historical fact that Jesus is alive and that as our Lord He has sent us to share that fact with the world. The folks who are sitting down at this conference probably do not share that view."
A code of conduct that affirms religious freedom and condemns coercion would be a marvelous thing. For one thing, it would give leaders of other traditions an opportunity to publicly renounce the atrocities committed every day in the name of their deities.

But if anyone thinks a piece of paper is going to deter Christians from obeying the command of our living Lord to take the Good News of freedom in Christ to all the nations, I've only got one thing to say:

Don't hold your breath.


Powered by ScribeFire.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

President Bush is wrong to announce all religions worship the same God.

The same God? Cal Thomas
In an official transcript released by the White House, the president said, "I believe in an almighty God, and I believe that all the world, whether they be Muslim, Christian, or any other religion, prays to the same God." Later in the interview, the president repeated his statement: "I believe there is a universal God. I believe the God that the Muslim prays to is the same God that I pray to. After all, we all came from Abraham. I believe in that universality."

To paraphrase a remark often attributed to the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, everyone is entitled to his or her own faith, but everyone is not entitled to define the central doctrines of that faith. The doctrines of what is called Christianity not only stand in stark contrast to Islam, they also teach something contrary to what the president says he believes.
f we all worship the same God, the president should answer the call of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Osama bin Laden, convert to Islam and no longer be a target of their wrath. What difference would it make if we all worship the same God?
The central doctrine of the Christian faith is that God sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to die for sinners and that by repenting of sin and accepting Christ as Savior, one is "saved" and is guaranteed a home in Heaven. Muslims do not believe God had a Son and, therefore, no atonement for sin is necessary. Muslims believe simply telling God one is sorry and repenting of sin is enough, if one also lives up to the five "pillars" of Islam. Furthermore, according to Muslims, Jesus did not die on a cross (as Christians believe); instead, God allowed Judas to look like Jesus and Judas was crucified.

Evangelical Christians believe the Bible is God's Word and is without error in the original manuscripts. Muslims respect the word of the prophets but claim the Bible has been corrupted (mostly by Jews) and is only correct insofar as it agrees with the Koran.
How can the president say we all worship the same God when Muslims deny the divinity of Jesus, whom the president accepts as the One through whom all must pass for salvation? Do both political parties have the same beliefs? Are all baseball teams equal (clearly not, because only two will go to the World Series)?


Powered by ScribeFire.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Vatican asks for respect for all faiths from Muslims.

Vatican urges Muslim respect for all faiths | Special reports | Guardian Unlimited
Muslims must respect people of all faiths and not exclude them on the grounds of religion, race or any other personal characteristic, a senior Vatican official said this week. In a message to celebrate Eid al-Fitr, the festival marking the end of Ramadan, the Pope's interfaith expert has called for a "culture of peace and solidarity" between different religious communities and to spread a teaching "which honours all human creatures".

Jean-Louis Cardinal Tauran, the newly-appointed president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, the Vatican's main liaison agency with the Muslim world, has previously expressed concern about the treatment of Christians in Muslim-majority countries.
Powered by ScribeFire.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, October 4, 2007

Take the 10 Commandments Challenge.

Take the 10 Commandments Challenge!

C'mon, it's not hard. Post your results.

Sphere: Related Content